Posted on April 19, 2008
The Primacy of Secular Morality
Religionists often accuse humanists of being without morals. This is wrong. The difference is that humanists ground their morality in actions impacting this world and not in those that might determine our place in the next. We recognize that morality does not exist without a crowd, that actions are to be judged not by whether a magical man in the sky finds them tasteful but, rather, whether they cause or alleviate worldly suffering.
Within the humanist ethical framework, a behavior that harms no one—and lacks wholly the potential to do so—cannot, by definition, be immoral. We find it extraordinarily bizarre that so many of our fellow global citizens base their notions of right and wrong on something so far removed from this simple principle. We watch in wonder and dismay as preachers, politicians, imams, and believers shout themselves hoarse and often take up arms because of a misplaced moral sense derived from guesses about the admittance criteria of a posthumous, immaterial theme park.
Because humanists believe this life is the only one we get, and that every other human is living his own, non-serial existence, we are acutely sensitive to the need to make it the most fulfilling, the most satisfying, the best it can be—and that we must constantly respect the desire of others to do the same. This understanding is the cornerstone of our morality. This placement of moral principle in the world, in the reality we all share, is what raises humanist ethics above those emanating from scripture. We can judge and adjust our actions not by the immutable standards of an invisible creator, but by the very real effects we see them cause around us.
That feedback, that awareness, is why humanist morality needs to be advanced, why work needs to be done to see it eventually usurp the religious. Until that shift transpires, wives around the world will continue to suffer at the hands of their godly husbands, men and women born to love their own gender will continue to be hated and murdered for nothing more than private displays of human tenderness, and children will continue to be taught to despise those with different superstitions than themselves.
It is time to take morality away from the prophets and give it back to the people.
If you like this, you might want to check out these posts, too.
- What Atheism Offers: Freedom from Sin
Theistic religion of the Christian variety espouses two kinds of morality, both owing their existence to god and his scriptural commandments. The first is familiar to all moral systems and forms the groundwork of humanist ethics. The second, however, is wholly alien to a secular worldview, one outside of the bounds of belief - What Atheism Offers: The Value of Life
Citing Stalin, Mao, and Hitler, religious believers frequently condemn atheists for not valuing human life, and condoning and causing widespread death and human misery. Setting aside the genuine question of Hitler’s religious standing, it ought to be clear that these atrocities, while committed by men who professed a lack of faith, were not enacted - It’s Okay To Kill: A Libertarian Argument for the Death Penalty
For those of us who believe in limited government and the fallibility of human certainty, the death penalty can pose quite a problem. Is it ever okay to kill someone because of his own criminal actions? I confess to being torn about the morally proper answer to this question. Even if I - How to Dismiss Intelligent Design
Christopher Hitchens once said, when speaking of religion, “That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.” This simple statement gives us all we need to safely ignore the silliness of intelligent design. Whether one thinks it is good evidence or bad, one cannot deny that there is evidence for evolution. - Not Since Jim Crow: The Racism of Affirmative Action
With Executive Order 11246, President Lyndon Johnson established affirmative action by mandating that federal contractors “take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin.” That was 1965. Over the next forty years, civil rights organizations and
GenreBanners.com Banner Exchange
